
GRID M6-8Q
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GRID M6-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID M6-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID M6-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
GRID M6-8Q
2015Radeon Pro W5500M
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GRID M6-8Q: it remains the more sensible modern option while GRID M6-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming.
- ✅Draws 85W instead of 100W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 100W vs 85W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,500 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GRID M6-8Q better than Radeon Pro W5500M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5500M make more sense than GRID M6-8Q?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 28 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 27 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 83 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 61 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 50 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 37 FPS | 19 FPS |
| medium | 28 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 22 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 117 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 40 FPS | 39 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 161 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 59 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 29 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-8Q and Radeon Pro W5500M

GRID M6-8Q
GRID M6-8Q
The GRID M6-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,568 points.

Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-8Q scores 3,568 and the Radeon Pro W5500M reaches 3,470 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GRID M6-8Q) vs 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M). Raw compute: 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID M6-8Q) vs 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M).
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,568+3% | 3,470 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+9% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.218 TFLOPS | 4.083 TFLOPS+84% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+9% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M6-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-8Q draws 100W versus the Radeon Pro W5500M's 85W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 85W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.7 | 40.8+14% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M6-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #535 | #544 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












