Radeon Pro W5500M vs Quadro M2000M
Radeon Pro W5500M
Popular choices:
Quadro M2000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro W5500M is positioned at rank 3 and the Quadro M2000M is on rank 177, so the Radeon Pro W5500M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500M
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M2000M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5500M uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro W5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M2000M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro M2000M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500M | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500M and Quadro M2000M
Radeon Pro W5500M
The Radeon Pro W5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,470 points.
Quadro M2000M
The Quadro M2000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1098 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,410 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500M scores 3,470 and the Quadro M2000M reaches 3,410 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro M2000M uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 640 (Quadro M2000M). Raw compute: 4.083 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000M). Boost clocks: 1450 MHz vs 1098 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,470+2% | 3,410 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+120% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.083 TFLOPS+191% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1450 MHz+32% | 1098 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+120% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M2000M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro M2000M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 4th Gen NVENC (Maxwell) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500M draws 85W versus the Quadro M2000M's 55W — a 42.9% difference. The Quadro M2000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500M) vs 350W (Quadro M2000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500M | Quadro M2000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 85W | 55W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 40.8 | 62.0+52% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5500M and Quadro M2000M
