
Radeon Pro W5500X vs GeForce GTX 980M

Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro W5500X is positioned at rank 124 and the GeForce GTX 980M is on rank 53, so the GeForce GTX 980M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500X
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 980M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5500X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro W5500X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 980M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro W5500X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 980M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $500 for the Radeon Pro W5500X, it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 525.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+525.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500X and GeForce GTX 980M

Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

GeForce GTX 980M
The GeForce GTX 980M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500X scores 7,351 and the GeForce GTX 980M reaches 7,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 980M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 980M). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 1.659 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980M). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 1127 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,351 | 7,353 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+225% | 1.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz+56% | 1127 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 980M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce GTX 980M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500X draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 980M's 100W — a 22.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 980M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 100W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.8 | 73.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980M costs 84% less ($420 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 91.9 (GeForce GTX 980M) — the GeForce GTX 980M offers 525.2% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | GeForce GTX 980M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $80-84% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 91.9+525% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GM204 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | October 7 2014 |
| Ranking | #345 | #344 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















