
Radeon Pro W5500X

RadeonT 780M
Radeon Pro W5500X vs RadeonT 780M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro W5500X vs RadeonT 780M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon Pro W5500X vs RadeonT 780M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅40.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌RadeonT 780M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌733.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 15W.
RadeonT 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 125W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5500X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 12.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro W5500X vs RadeonT 780M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

RadeonT 780M
The RadeonT 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,098 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500X scores 7,351 and the RadeonT 780M reaches 7,098 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RadeonT 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 768 (RadeonT 780M). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (RadeonT 780M). Boost clocks: 1757 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,351+4% | 7,098 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS | 8.909 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1757 MHz | 2900 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 96+100% | 48 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500X has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 780M carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro W5500X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500X and 128-bit on the RadeonT 780M.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 12.2 (RadeonT 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs VCN 4.0 (RadeonT 780M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RadeonT 780M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500X draws 125W versus the RadeonT 780M's 15W — a 157.1% difference. The RadeonT 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 350W (RadeonT 780M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 15W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.8 | 473.2+705% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RadeonT 780M (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | RadeonT 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Phoenix |
| Release | December 11 2019 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #345 | #359 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














