
GRID P40-8Q

Radeon Pro W5500X
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon Pro W5500X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon Pro W5500X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon Pro W5500X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-8Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌400.8% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$599 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 12.3 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌80% higher power demand at 225W vs 125W.
Radeon Pro W5500X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,401 less on MSRP ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 390.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.3 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 225W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-8Q vs Radeon Pro W5500X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-8Q
The GRID P40-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,507 points.

Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-8Q scores 7,507 and the Radeon Pro W5500X reaches 7,351 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5500X uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-8Q) vs 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1757 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,507+2% | 7,351 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 5.398 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1757 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+33% | 96 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-8Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5500X carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro W5500X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-8Q and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5500X.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 5.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 5 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GRID P40-8Q) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP7 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID P40-8Q) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP7 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-8Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro W5500X's 125W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon Pro W5500X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P40-8Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 125W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 33.4 | 58.8+76% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-8Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599. On MSRP, Radeon Pro W5500X was 80% cheaper ($2401 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (GRID P40-8Q) vs 12.3 (Radeon Pro W5500X) — the Radeon Pro W5500X offers 392% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W5500X (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-8Q | Radeon Pro W5500X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $599-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.5 | 12.3+392% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 14 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | December 11 2019 |
| Ranking | #505 | #345 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














