
Radeon Pro W5500X
Popular choices:

Quadro T2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro W5500X is positioned at rank 124 and the Quadro T2000 is on rank 125, so the Radeon Pro W5500X offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500X
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T2000
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W5500X is significantly newer (2019 vs 2010). The Radeon Pro W5500X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro T2000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5500X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T2000.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro T2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $75 versus $500 for the Radeon Pro W5500X, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 560.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+560.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500X and Quadro T2000

Radeon Pro W5500X
The Radeon Pro W5500X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 11 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1757 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,351 points. Launch price was $599.

Quadro T2000
The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500X scores 7,351 and the Quadro T2000 reaches 7,279 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500X is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 7 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 5.398 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,351 | 7,279 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+700% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.398 TFLOPS+1025% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 96+200% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500X comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the Radeon Pro W5500X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 5 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 5+25% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 7.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP9 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500X draws 125W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 67.4% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 62W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 58.8 | 117.4+100% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500X launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600 and now averages $75. The Quadro T2000 costs 85% less ($425 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.7 (Radeon Pro W5500X) vs 97.1 (Quadro T2000) — the Quadro T2000 offers 560.5% better value. The Radeon Pro W5500X is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500X | Quadro T2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $600 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $75-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.7 | 97.1+561% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GF106 |
| Release | December 11 2019 | December 24 2010 |
| Ranking | #345 | #902 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















