Radeon PRO W6600 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Radeon PRO W6600
Popular choices:
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W6600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W6600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600 and Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600 scores 14,932 and the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) reaches 14,832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 2903 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,932 | 14,832 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+100% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.4 TFLOPS+242% | 3.037 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2903 MHz+71% | 1695 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) has 16 GB. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) — the Radeon PRO W6600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600 draws 100W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 18W — a 139% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 18W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 149.3 | 824.0+452% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $649 | — |
| Codename | Navi 23 | TU117 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | December 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #153 | #548 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6600 and Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
