CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W6600
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6650M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6600.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 6650M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600 and Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
Radeon RX 6650M
The Radeon RX 6650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,171 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600 scores 14,932 and the Radeon RX 6650M reaches 15,171 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6650M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6650M). Raw compute: 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6650M). Boost clocks: 2903 MHz vs 2416 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,932 | 15,171+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.4 TFLOPS+20% | 8.659 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2903 MHz+20% | 2416 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W6600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 6650M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6650M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 6650M).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600 draws 100W versus the Radeon RX 6650M's 120W — a 18.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 190mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-17% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 190mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 149.3+18% | 126.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6650M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $649 | — |
| Codename | Navi 23 | Navi 23 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #153 | #148 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6600 and Radeon RX 6650M
