
Radeon PRO W6600

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Radeon PRO W6600 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon PRO W6600 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon PRO W6600 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 50.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌42.9% higher power demand at 100W vs 70W.
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
2024Why buy it
- ✅3.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 100W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌53.9% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 15.3 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon PRO W6600 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600 scores 14,932 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2903 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 88.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,932 | 15,252+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2816+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.4 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 2903 MHz+36% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.8 MB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+27% | 22 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6600 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation carries 16 GB. RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000E Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600 draws 100W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 149.3 | 217.9+46% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon PRO W6600 came in at $649, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6600 was 35% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the Radeon PRO W6600 offers 50.3% better value. The newer card here is RTX 2000E Ada Generation (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-35% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0+50% | 15.3 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | AD107 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #153 | #107 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














