Radeon PRO W6600 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Radeon PRO W6600
Popular choices:
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6600
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6600.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon PRO W6600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $649 versus $999 for the RTX 2000E Ada Generation, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 50.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+50.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($649) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W6600 and RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
RTX 2000E Ada Generation
The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W6600 scores 14,932 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W6600 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 2903 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 22 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) vs 88.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,932 | 15,252+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2816+57% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.4 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 2903 MHz+36% | 2130 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.8 MB+460% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+27% | 22 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W6600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has 16 GB. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W6600 draws 100W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 35.3% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 190mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 70W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 190mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 149.3 | 217.9+46% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $649, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999 and now averages $999. The Radeon PRO W6600 costs 35% less ($350 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the Radeon PRO W6600 offers 50.3% better value. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W6600 | RTX 2000E Ada Generation |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-35% | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $649-35% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.0+50% | 15.3 |
| Codename | Navi 23 | AD107 |
| Release | June 8 2021 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #153 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W6600 and RTX 2000E Ada Generation
