CPU
GPU
Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6650M XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7600.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6650M XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $400 versus $599 for the Radeon PRO W7600, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 55.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($599) | ✅More affordable ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon RX 6650M XT
Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.
Radeon RX 6650M XT
The Radeon RX 6650M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,071 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the Radeon RX 6650M XT reaches 17,071 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 6650M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 2416 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443 | 17,071+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz | 2416 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO W7600 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 256 GB/s (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — a 14.3% advantage for the Radeon RX 6650M XT. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 256 GB/s+14% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6650M XT).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 6650M XT's 120W — a 8% difference. The Radeon RX 6650M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6650M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W | 120W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 240mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5 | 142.3+12% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $599, while the Radeon RX 6650M XT launched at $400 and now averages $400. The Radeon RX 6650M XT costs 33.2% less ($199 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.5 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 42.7 (Radeon RX 6650M XT) — the Radeon RX 6650M XT offers 55.3% better value. The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | Radeon RX 6650M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $400-33% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $599 | $400-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.5 | 42.7+55% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #123 | #113 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO W7600 and Radeon RX 6650M XT
