
Radeon PRO W7600 vs RTX A5000 Mobile

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:

RTX A5000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Per Dollar RTX A5000 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO W7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RTX A5000 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W7600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and RTX A5000 Mobile

Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A5000 Mobile
The RTX A5000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,340 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the RTX A5000 Mobile reaches 16,340 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A5000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 6,144 (RTX A5000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 1575 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443 | 16,340 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 6144+200% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz+55% | 1575 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A5000 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A5000 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12.2 (RTX A5000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A5000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A5000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the RTX A5000 Mobile's 150W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (RTX A5000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-13% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+16% | 108.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A5000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA104 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #123 | #124 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















