
Radeon PRO W7600 vs RTX A4500 Mobile

Radeon PRO W7600
Popular choices:

RTX A4500 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W7600
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4500 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4500 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W7600.
| Insight | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A4500 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO W7600 and RTX A4500 Mobile

Radeon PRO W7600
The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

RTX A4500 Mobile
The RTX A4500 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,613 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the RTX A4500 Mobile reaches 16,613 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A4500 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 5,888 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,443 | 16,613+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 5888+188% |
| Boost Clock | 2440 MHz+63% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 184+44% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon PRO W7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A4500 Mobile has 16 GB. The RTX A4500 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12.2 (RTX A4500 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4500 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RTX A4500 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the RTX A4500 Mobile's 140W — a 7.4% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (RTX A4500 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-7% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 126.5+7% | 118.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO W7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon PRO W7600 | RTX A4500 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $599 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA104 |
| Release | August 3 2023 | March 22 2022 |
| Ranking | #123 | #119 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














