G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon PRO W7600 vs Radeon RX 7800M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon PRO W7600 vs Radeon RX 7800M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon PRO W7600

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 130W instead of 180W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Radeon RX 7800M is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.

Radeon RX 7800M

2024

Why buy it

✅71.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌38.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon RX 7800M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 71.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W7600 instead at 16,443 vs 15,984, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7800M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Radeon PRO W7600 has no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 6nm, and 60 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W7600 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon PRO W7600 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, Radeon RX 7800M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon PRO W7600 vs Radeon RX 7800M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon PRO W7600

The Radeon PRO W7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2440 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,443 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon RX 7800M

The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon PRO W7600 scores 16,443 and the Radeon RX 7800M reaches 15,984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO W7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 2440 MHz vs 2335 MHz.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7600	Radeon RX 7800M
G3D Mark Score	16,443+3%	15,984
Architecture	RDNA 3.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2048	3840+88%
Boost Clock	2440 MHz+4%	2335 MHz
ROPs	64	96+50%
TMUs	128	240+88%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7600 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7600	Radeon RX 7800M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon PRO W7600 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7800M carries 12 GB. Radeon RX 7800M gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) — a 92.9% advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W7600 and 192-bit on the Radeon RX 7800M.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7600	Radeon RX 7800M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	224 GB/s	432 GB/s+93%
Bus Width	256-bit+33%	192-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7600	Radeon RX 7800M
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7600) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7600	Radeon RX 7800M
Encoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCN 4.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon PRO W7600 draws 130W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 32.3% difference. The Radeon PRO W7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon PRO W7600) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 240mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon PRO W7600	Radeon RX 7800M
TDP	130W-28%	180W
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	240mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	126.5+42%	88.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon RX 7800M (2024 vs 2023).

Feature	Radeon PRO W7600	Radeon RX 7800M
MSRP	$599	—
Codename	Navi 33	Navi 32
Release	August 3 2023	September 11 2024
Ranking	#123	#131

Search Radeon PRO W7600 on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 7800M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.