
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 850M

Radeon Pro WX 3100
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 850M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is positioned at rank 113 and the GeForce GTX 850M is on rank 68, so the GeForce GTX 850M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3100
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 850M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 850M.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 850M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 850M holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $65), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 59.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+59.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($65) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3100 and GeForce GTX 850M

Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 850M
The GeForce GTX 850M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 936 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,537 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 scores 2,584 and the GeForce GTX 850M reaches 2,537 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 850M uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 850M). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 1.155 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,584+2% | 2,537 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS+8% | 1.155 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 850M has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 850M) — the GeForce GTX 850M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 11.0 (GeForce GTX 850M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs NVENC 2.0 (GeForce GTX 850M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 (GeForce GTX 850M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | NVENC 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 850M's 45W — a 36.4% difference. The GeForce GTX 850M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 850M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 45W-31% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 39.8 | 56.4+42% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 850M costs 38.5% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.8 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 63.4 (GeForce GTX 850M) — the GeForce GTX 850M offers 59.3% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | GeForce GTX 850M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65 | $40-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8 | 63.4+59% |
| Codename | Lexa | GM107 |
| Release | June 12 2017 | March 12 2014 |
| Ranking | #624 | #629 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















