
Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs Radeon HD 8770

Radeon Pro WX 3100
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 8770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is positioned at rank 113 and the Radeon HD 8770 is on rank 271, so the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3100
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8770
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon Pro WX 3100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $150), it costs 57% less, resulting in a 128.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+128.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($65) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3100 and Radeon HD 8770

Radeon Pro WX 3100
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon HD 8770
The Radeon HD 8770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 775 MHz to 825 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,607 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 scores 2,584 and the Radeon HD 8770 reaches 2,607 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 8770 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 384 (Radeon HD 8770). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 0.6336 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8770). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 825 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,584 | 2,607 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.248 TFLOPS+97% | 0.6336 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1219 MHz+48% | 825 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8770 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon Pro WX 3100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 12_0 (Radeon HD 8770). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8770). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 4.0.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 draws 65W versus the Radeon HD 8770's 50W — a 26.1% difference. The Radeon HD 8770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 168mm vs 240mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W | 50W-23% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 168mm | 240mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 39.8 | 52.1+31% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 3100 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the Radeon HD 8770 launched at $150 and now averages $150. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 costs 56.7% less ($85 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.8 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 17.4 (Radeon HD 8770) — the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 128.7% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 3100 | Radeon HD 8770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $150-25% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $65-57% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.8+129% | 17.4 |
| Codename | Lexa | Mars |
| Release | June 12 2017 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #624 | #844 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















