Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 950A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is positioned at rank 113 and the GeForce GTX 950A is on rank 286, so the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 3100

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

98%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

97%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

96%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

95%

#64

RTX 4000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1547

93%

#65

RTX A4000H

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $927

91%

#98

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1138%

#113

Radeon Pro WX 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $65

100%

#117

Radeon Pro 580X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

97%

#118

Radeon Pro WX 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $45

97%

#119

CMP 40HX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $120

96%

#124

Radeon Pro W5500X

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

95%

#125

Quadro T2000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $75

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 950A

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

94%

#276

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

664%

#278

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

602%

#279

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

600%

#283

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

546%

#284

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

542%

#286

GeForce GTX 950A

MSRP: $159|Avg: $30

100%

#288

Radeon 540X

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

98%

#289

GeForce 930MX

MSRP: $80|Avg: $25

98%

#291

GeForce MX250

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

97%

#292

Radeon 630

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

96%

#293

GeForce MX330

MSRP: $150|Avg: $100

96%

#297

Radeon RX 780

MSRP: $499|Avg: $721

94%

#300

GeForce 940MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

92%

#301

GeForce MX130

MSRP: $120|Avg: $50

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 950A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 3100	GeForce GTX 950A
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 950A offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 950A holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $65), it costs 54% less, resulting in a 117.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 3100	GeForce GTX 950A
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+117.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($65)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 3100 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 950A Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 3100 and GeForce GTX 950A

Radeon Pro WX 3100

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 12 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,584 points. Launch price was $199.

GeForce GTX 950A

The GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 993 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,599 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 scores 2,584 and the GeForce GTX 950A reaches 2,599 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GTX 950A uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 950A). Raw compute: 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 1.439 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950A). Boost clocks: 1219 MHz vs 1124 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3100	GeForce GTX 950A
G3D Mark Score	2,584	2,599
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	640+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.248 TFLOPS	1.439 TFLOPS+15%
Boost Clock	1219 MHz+8%	1124 MHz
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	40+25%
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3100	GeForce GTX 950A
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 950A has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3100	GeForce GTX 950A
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	DDR3
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 draws 65W versus the GeForce GTX 950A's 75W — a 14.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 950A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 3100	GeForce GTX 950A
TDP	65W-13%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	39.8+15%	34.7

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro WX 3100 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $65, while the GeForce GTX 950A launched at $159 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 950A costs 53.8% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.8 (Radeon Pro WX 3100) vs 86.6 (GeForce GTX 950A) — the GeForce GTX 950A offers 117.6% better value. The Radeon Pro WX 3100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).