
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs P104-100

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:

P104-100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is positioned at rank #148 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4100
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the P104-100.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The P104-100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the P104-100 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $85), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 749.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+749.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($85) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4100 and P104-100

Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

P104-100
The P104-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 12 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the P104-100 reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the P104-100 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 1,920 (P104-100). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 6.655 TFLOPS (P104-100). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682 | 3,678 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1920+88% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS | 6.655 TFLOPS+171% |
| Boost Clock | 1201 MHz | 1733 MHz+44% |
| ROPs | 16 | 64+300% |
| TMUs | 64 | 120+88% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 720 KB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the P104-100 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 2 MB (P104-100) — the P104-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the P104-100's 30W — a 50% difference. The P104-100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (P104-100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 73.6 | 122.6+67% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the P104-100 launched at $0 and now averages $10. The P104-100 costs 88.2% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 367.8 (P104-100) — the P104-100 offers 749.4% better value. The P104-100 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | P104-100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85 | $10-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.3 | 367.8+749% |
| Codename | Baffin | GP104 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | December 12 2017 |
| Ranking | #526 | #529 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















