
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs Quadro P620

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:

Quadro P620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is positioned at rank 148 and the Quadro P620 is on rank 74, so the Quadro P620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4100
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P620 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $85 for the Radeon Pro WX 4100, it costs 44% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 77.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+77.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($85) | ✅More affordable ($48) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Quadro P620

Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1443 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682 | 3,698 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+100% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS+66% | 1.478 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1201 MHz | 1443 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 40W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 73.6 | 92.5+26% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170 and now averages $48. The Quadro P620 costs 43.5% less ($37 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 43.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 77.0 (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 offers 77.8% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $170-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85 | $48-44% |
| Performance per Dollar | 43.3 | 77.0+78% |
| Codename | Baffin | GP107 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #526 | #524 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











