Radeon Pro WX 4100
T400 4GB
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400 4GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌150.9% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $240 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 159.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon Pro WX 4100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 scores 3,682 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1201 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682 | 3,803+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.46 TFLOPS+125% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1201 MHz | 1425 MHz+19% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4100 and 64-bit on the T400 4GB.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 draws 50W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 50% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 73.6 | 126.8+72% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 4100 came in at $399, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. On MSRP, T400 4GB was 60.2% cheaper ($240 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 159.8% better value. The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon Pro WX 4100 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $159-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.2 | 23.9+160% |
| Codename | Baffin | TU117 |
| Release | November 10 2016 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #526 | #518 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro WX 4100 and T400 4GB
