
Radeon 840M

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Destiny 2

Elden Ring
Radeon 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅12.1% more average FPS across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Radeon Pro WX 4100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 840M across 11 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 840M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 840M scores 3,803 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3+ while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 256 (Radeon 840M) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,803+3% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3+ | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 256 | 1024+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+141% | 1201 MHz |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 840M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 840M and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4100.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 840M draws 30W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 50% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 840M) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 126.8+72% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 840M (2024 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 840M | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Codename | Krackan Point | Baffin |
| Release | June 2 2024 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #516 | #526 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














