
GeForce GTX 680MX

Radeon 840M
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon 840M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon 840M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone

Elden Ring

Final Fantasy XIV
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon 840M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680MX
2012Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 840M across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌306.7% higher power demand at 122W vs 30W.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅6.6% more average FPS across 20 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 122W, a 92W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon 840M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Radeon 840M reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 256 (Radeon 840M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,799 | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+500% | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 840M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680MX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 840M carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 680MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680MX and System on the Radeon 840M.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Kepler) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 121.1% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 90.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 30W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80-11% | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1 | 126.8+308% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













