GeForce GTX 680MX
VS
Radeon 840M

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon 840M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012Core: 720 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon 840M

2024Boost: 2900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680MX is positioned at rank 79 and the Radeon 840M is on rank 24, so the Radeon 840M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680MX

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
94%
#69
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
229%
#71
207%
#72
207%
#76
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
188%
#77
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
187%
#79
GeForce GTX 680MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#82
Arc 7-Core iGPU
MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A
99%
#86
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
96%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 840M

#14
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
143%
#16
129%
#17
129%
#21
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
117%
#22
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
117%
#24
Radeon 840M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#35
GeForce GTX 960M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
89%
#37
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 840M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2012). The Radeon 840M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 840M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon 840M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 840M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon 840M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

AMD

Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Radeon 840M reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 256 (Radeon 840M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon 840M
G3D Mark Score
3,799
3,803
Architecture
Kepler
RDNA 3+
Process Node
28 nm
4 nm
Shading Units
1536+500%
256

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon 840M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680MX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 840M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 680MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon 840M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon 840M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon 840M
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Kepler)
VCN 4.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 121.1% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 90.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon 840M
TDP
122W
30W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
80-11%
90
Perf/Watt
31.1
126.8+308%