
GeForce GTX 680MX

Quadro P620
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro P620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro P620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680MX
2012Why buy it
- ✅30.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ❌205% higher power demand at 122W vs 40W.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅GeForce GTX 680MX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 122W, a 82W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680MX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680MX vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 512 (Quadro P620).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,799+3% | 3,698 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+200% | 512 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680MX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680MX has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P620 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 680MX gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680MX and 64-bit on the Quadro P620.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (FL12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Kepler) | NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 101.2% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 70°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 40W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 145mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1 | 92.5+197% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $170 |
| Codename | — | GP107 |
| Release | October 23 2012 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #520 | #524 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














