GeForce GTX 680MX
VS
Radeon R9 M485X

GeForce GTX 680MX vs Radeon R9 M485X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012Core: 720 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

2016Core: 723 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680MX is positioned at rank 79 and the Radeon R9 M485X is on rank 393, so the GeForce GTX 680MX offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680MX

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
94%
#69
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
229%
#71
207%
#72
207%
#76
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
188%
#77
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
187%
#79
GeForce GTX 680MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#82
Arc 7-Core iGPU
MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A
99%
#87
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
96%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M485X

#383
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1285%
#385
1165%
#386
1162%
#390
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1056%
#391
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1049%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
100%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
100%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
99%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
98%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
98%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
97%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
95%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
95%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
92%
#404
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
92%
#406
92%
#407
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
89%
#408
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M485X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 M485X remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680MX and Radeon R9 M485X

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
G3D Mark Score
3,799
3,801
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
2048+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680MX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M485X has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 680MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
160 GB/s
Unknown
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M485X). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC (Kepler)
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 68.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 680MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
TDP
122W-51%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
31.1+105%
15.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 M485X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXRadeon R9 M485X
MSRP
$450
Avg Price (30d)
$150
Codename
Amethyst
Release
October 23 2012
May 15 2016
Ranking
#520
#519