GeForce GTX 680MX
VS
T400 4GB

GeForce GTX 680MX vs T400 4GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

2012Core: 720 MHz
VS

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680MX is positioned at rank 79 and the T400 4GB is on rank 63, so the T400 4GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680MX

#25
Radeon RX 7600M XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $300
94%
#69
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
229%
#71
207%
#72
207%
#76
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
188%
#77
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
187%
#79
GeForce GTX 680MX
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#82
Arc 7-Core iGPU
MSRP: $199|Avg: N/A
99%
#87
Radeon RX 560 (móvel)
MSRP: $99|Avg: $50
96%
#92
Radeon RX 550 (móvel)
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB

#28
Quadro P5200
MSRP: $500|Avg: $240
97%
#29
Radeon PRO W7700
MSRP: $999|Avg: $999
97%
#30
Radeon PRO W6600
MSRP: $649|Avg: $649
96%
#32
Radeon AI PRO R9700
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1450
92%
#33
Radeon Pro Vega 64
MSRP: $599|Avg: $114
90%
#48
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
618%
#63
T400 4GB
MSRP: $159|Avg: $99
100%
#64
Radeon Pro 5300
MSRP: $300|Avg: $150
99%
#69
Radeon Pro W5500
MSRP: $399|Avg: $300
93%
#72
Quadro P2200
MSRP: $429|Avg: $227
91%
#73
T1000
MSRP: $350|Avg: $382
91%
#74
Quadro P620
MSRP: $170|Avg: $48
91%
#78
Radeon Pro 570
MSRP: $300|Avg: $100
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The T400 4GB is significantly newer (2021 vs 2012). The T400 4GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The T400 4GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the T400 4GB remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680MX and T400 4GB

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 680MX

The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 384 (T400 4GB).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
G3D Mark Score
3,799
3,803
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1536+300%
384

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680MX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 680MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+100%
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
256-bit+300%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12_0
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
Encoder
NVENC (Kepler)
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC (Kepler)
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 121.1% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
TDP
122W
30W-75%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
156mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80
Perf/Watt
31.1
126.8+308%
💰

Value Analysis

The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 680MXT400 4GB
MSRP
$159
Avg Price (30d)
$99
Codename
TU117
Release
October 23 2012
May 6 2021
Ranking
#520
#518