CPU
GPU
GeForce GTX 680MX
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 775M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GTX 680MX is positioned at rank 79 and the GeForce GTX 775M is on rank 23, so the GeForce GTX 775M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 680MX
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 775M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 775M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 680MX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 775M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 775M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce GTX 775M
GeForce GTX 680MX
The GeForce GTX 680MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 23 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 720 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 122W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,799 points.
GeForce GTX 775M
The GeForce GTX 775M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 719 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,837 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680MX scores 3,799 and the GeForce GTX 775M reaches 3,837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680MX is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTX 775M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 1,344 (GeForce GTX 775M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 775M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,799 | 3,837+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+14% | 1344 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 775M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680MX comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 775M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 680MX offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 775M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 11_0 (GeForce GTX 775M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 775M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0)+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Kepler) (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 775M). Decoder: NVDEC (Kepler) vs NVDEC 1st Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 775M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 775M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Kepler) | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Kepler) | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-1,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680MX draws 122W versus the GeForce GTX 775M's 100W — a 19.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 775M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 680MX) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 775M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680MX | GeForce GTX 775M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 122W | 100W-18% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 31.1 | 38.4+23% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 680MX and GeForce GTX 775M
