GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 840M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 840M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 840M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌650% higher power demand at 225W vs 30W.

Radeon 840M

2024

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 30W instead of 225W, a 195W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID V100-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.2% in PassMark G3D (3,811 vs 3,803), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 840M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID V100-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID V100-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 840M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 840M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100-2Q

The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.

Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100-2Q scores 3,811 and the Radeon 840M reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q) vs 256 (Radeon 840M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 840M
G3D Mark Score	3,811	3,803
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 3+
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	2048+700%	256
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	2900 MHz+146%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 840M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100-2Q and System on the Radeon 840M.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 840M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 152.9% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 840M
TDP	225W	30W-87%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	90
Perf/Watt	16.9	126.8+650%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 840M (2024 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 840M
MSRP	$10000	—
Codename	GM204	Krackan Point
Release	August 30 2015	June 2 2024
Ranking	#433	#516

Search GRID V100-2Q on Amazon

Search Radeon 840M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.