GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon R9 M485X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon R9 M485X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon R9 M485X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
2122.2% HIGHER MSRP
$10,000 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.4 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).

Radeon R9 M485X

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $9,550 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 2116.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.4 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID V100-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (3,811 vs 3,801), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID V100-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M485X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $9,550 cheaper on MSRP at $450 vs $10,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2116.4% (8.4 vs 0.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M485X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID V100-2Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon R9 M485X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100-2Q

The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100-2Q scores 3,811 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon R9 M485X
G3D Mark Score	3,811	3,801
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+63%	2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon R9 M485X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100-2Q and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M485X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) — the GRID V100-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon R9 M485X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID V100-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon R9 M485X
TDP	225W-10%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	16.9+11%	15.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID V100-2Q came in at $10000, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M485X was 95.5% cheaper ($9550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.4 (GRID V100-2Q) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Radeon R9 M485X offers 2000% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M485X (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP	$10000	$450-96%
Performance per Dollar	0.4	8.4+2000%
Codename	GM204	Amethyst
Release	August 30 2015	May 15 2016
Ranking	#433	#519

Search GRID V100-2Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M485X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.