GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 680M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 680M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 680M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 680M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (3,836 vs 3,811), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 680M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID V100-2Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID V100-2Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 680M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100-2Q vs Radeon 680M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100-2Q

The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID V100-2Q scores 3,811 and the Radeon 680M reaches 3,836 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon 680M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q) vs 768 (Radeon 680M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q) vs 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 680M
G3D Mark Score	3,811	3,836
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+43%	3.379 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	2200 MHz+87%
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 680M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100-2Q and System on the Radeon 680M.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 680M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon 680M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon 680M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 680M
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	16.9	76.7+354%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 680M (2023 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID V100-2Q	Radeon 680M
MSRP	$10000	—
Codename	GM204	Rembrandt+
Release	August 30 2015	January 3 2023
Ranking	#433	#512

Search GRID V100-2Q on Amazon

Search Radeon 680M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.