GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
526.6% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 9.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

2016

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,101 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 524.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (3,695 vs 3,682), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-1Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Pro WX 4100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,101 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 524.4% (9.2 vs 1.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-1Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro WX 4100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-1Q

The GRID M60-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,695 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100

The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-1Q scores 3,695 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1Q) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1201 MHz.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
G3D Mark Score	3,695	3,682
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+96%	2.46 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1201 MHz+2%
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M60-1Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 carries 4 GB. Radeon Pro WX 4100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-1Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 4100. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the GRID M60-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	16.4	73.6+349%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-1Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 4100 was 84% cheaper ($2101 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GRID M60-1Q) vs 9.2 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 513.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 4100 (2016 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro WX 4100
MSRP	$2500	$399-84%
Performance per Dollar	1.5	9.2+513%
Codename	GM204	Baffin
Release	August 30 2015	November 10 2016
Ranking	#525	#526

Search GRID M60-1Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 4100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.