GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro 560X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-1Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro 560X

2018

Why buy it

✅GRID M60-1Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 560X is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-1Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (3,695 vs 3,678), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 560X is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M60-1Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M60-1Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 560X has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-1Q vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-1Q

The GRID M60-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,695 points.

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-1Q scores 3,695 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-1Q) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro 560X
G3D Mark Score	3,695	3,678
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+135%	2.056 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+300%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	768 KB+200%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro 560X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID M60-1Q and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-1Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 560X) — the GRID M60-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro 560X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Pro 560X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-1Q) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro 560X
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	16.4	49.0+199%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-1Q came in at $2500, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($2500 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.5 (GRID M60-1Q) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro 560X (2018 vs 2015).

Feature	GRID M60-1Q	Radeon Pro 560X
MSRP	$2500	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	1.5	Infinity
Codename	GM204	Polaris 21
Release	August 30 2015	July 16 2018
Ranking	#525	#528

Search GRID M60-1Q on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 560X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.