
Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro WX 4100

Quadro P620
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank 74 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 is on rank 148, so the Quadro P620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P620 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P620 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $85 for the Radeon Pro WX 4100, it costs 44% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 77.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+77.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($85) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and Radeon Pro WX 4100

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4100
The Radeon Pro WX 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 10 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1125 MHz to 1201 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon Pro WX 4100 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.46 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1201 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,682 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 2.46 TFLOPS+66% |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz+20% | 1201 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P620 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4100's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-20% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+26% | 73.6 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Radeon Pro WX 4100 launched at $399 and now averages $85. The Quadro P620 costs 43.5% less ($37 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.0 (Quadro P620) vs 43.3 (Radeon Pro WX 4100) — the Quadro P620 offers 77.8% better value. The Quadro P620 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro WX 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170-57% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-44% | $85 |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.0+78% | 43.3 |
| Codename | GP107 | Baffin |
| Release | February 1 2018 | November 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #524 | #526 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











