Quadro P620 vs Radeon 840M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank 74 and the Radeon 840M is on rank 24, so the Radeon 840M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620

#33

Radeon Pro Vega 64

MSRP: $599|Avg: $114

99%

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

86%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

83%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

83%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

81%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

81%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

78%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

76%

#59

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

679%

#74

Quadro P620

MSRP: $170|Avg: $48

100%

#78

Radeon Pro 570

MSRP: $300|Avg: $100

97%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

92%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

79%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

75%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 840M

#14

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

143%

#16

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

129%

#17

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

129%

#21

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

117%

#22

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

117%

#24

Radeon 840M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#35

GeForce GTX 960M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

89%

#37

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

87%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 840M is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The Radeon 840M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P620 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 840M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P620.

Insight	Quadro P620	Radeon 840M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021))	RDNA 3+ (2024) (4nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 840M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro P620 Benchmark Check

Radeon 840M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and Radeon 840M

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Radeon 840M

The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon 840M reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 14 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 256 (Radeon 840M). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P620	Radeon 840M
G3D Mark Score	3,698	3,803+3%
Architecture	Pascal	RDNA 3+
Process Node	14 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	512+100%	256
Boost Clock	1443 MHz	2900 MHz+101%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro P620	Radeon 840M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

Feature	Quadro P620	Radeon 840M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon 840M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P620	Radeon 840M
DirectX	12 (FL12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 840M). Decoder: NVDEC vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon 840M).

Feature	Quadro P620	Radeon 840M
Encoder	NVENC (Pascal)	VCN 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC	VCN 4.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 90.

Feature	Quadro P620	Radeon 840M
TDP	40W	30W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	145mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70°C-22%	90
Perf/Watt	92.5	126.8+37%