Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX 560

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 560

2017Core: 1175 MHzBoost: 1275 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX 560 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • Radeon RX 560 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.
  • Measures 145mm instead of 170mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 71.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $170 MSRPvs$99 MSRP

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

  • 30.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $71 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • Delivers 71% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.
  • 17.2% longer card at 170mm vs 145mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P620 instead at 3,698 vs 3,682, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2018 generation instead of 2017. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $71 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $170, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 71% (37.2 vs 21.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon RX 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro P620 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

AMD

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1275 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score
3,698
3,682
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512
1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.478 TFLOPS
2.611 TFLOPS+77%
Boost Clock
1443 MHz+13%
1275 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P620 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P620 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 560 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P620 and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
256-bit+300%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
DirectX
12 (FL12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.4
Decoder
NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 145mm vs 170mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70 C.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
TDP
40W-47%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W-22%
450W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
145mm
170mm
Height
69mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
70 C
Perf/Watt
92.5+88%
49.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P620 came in at $170, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 was 41.8% cheaper ($71 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 70.6% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2017).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon RX 560
MSRP
$170
$99-42%
Performance per Dollar
21.8
37.2+71%
Codename
GP107
Polaris 21
Release
February 1 2018
April 18 2017
Ranking
#524
#527

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.