
Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro 560X

Quadro P620
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank #74 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P620 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 560X.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P620 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and Radeon Pro 560X

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,678 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 1024+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 2.056 TFLOPS+39% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 256 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-47% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+89% | 49.0 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($48 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.0 (Quadro P620) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.0 | Infinity |
| Codename | GP107 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | July 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #524 | #528 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















