Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro 560X

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

2018Core: 1004 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro 560X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 40W instead of 75W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro 560X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro 560X

2018

Why buy it

  • 26.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 21.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • 87.5% higher power demand at 75W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro 560X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 26.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro P620 instead at 3,698 vs 3,678, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P620 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon Pro 560X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 560X

The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon Pro 560X
G3D Mark Score
3,698
3,678
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 4.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
512
1024+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.478 TFLOPS
2.056 TFLOPS+39%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
64+100%
L1 Cache
192 KB
256 KB+33%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon Pro 560X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P620 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon Pro 560X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro 560X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon Pro 560X
DirectX
12 (FL12_1)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.4+8%
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon Pro 560X). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro 560X).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon Pro 560X
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon Pro 560X
TDP
40W-47%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70°C-7%
75
Perf/Watt
92.5+89%
49.0
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P620 came in at $170, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($170 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon Pro 560X
MSRP
$170
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
21.8
Infinity
Codename
GP107
Polaris 21
Release
February 1 2018
July 16 2018
Ranking
#524
#528

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.