GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620

NVIDIA

GeForce MX450

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX450

2020

Why buy it

  • 40.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Quadro P620 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 40W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 47.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $250 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $80 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
  • Delivers 46.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce MX450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 60% higher power demand at 40W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce MX450 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 40.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (3,720 vs 3,698), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce MX450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $80 cheaper on MSRP at $170 vs $250, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 46.2% (21.8 vs 14.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro P620 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce MX450 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce MX450

The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1443 MHz.

FeatureGeForce MX450Quadro P620
G3D Mark Score
3,720
3,698
Architecture
Turing
Pascal
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
896+75%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.226 TFLOPS+118%
1.478 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1575 MHz+9%
1443 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce MX450Quadro P620
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 64-bit on the Quadro P620.

FeatureGeForce MX450Quadro P620
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce MX450Quadro P620
TDP
25W-38%
40W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Mobile
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
148.8+61%
92.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 32% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 offers 46.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2018).

FeatureGeForce MX450Quadro P620
MSRP
$250
$170-32%
Performance per Dollar
14.9
21.8+46%
Codename
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
GP107
Release
August 1 2020
February 1 2018
Ranking
#523
#524

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.