GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Quadro P620
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX450 is positioned at rank 307 and the Quadro P620 is on rank 74, so the Quadro P620 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P620.
| Insight | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $200 for the GeForce MX450, it costs 76% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 314.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+314.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($48) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and Quadro P620
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1443 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,698 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+118% | 1.478 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+9% | 1443 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-38% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+61% | 92.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170 and now averages $48. The Quadro P620 costs 76% less ($152 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.6 (GeForce MX450) vs 77.0 (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 offers 314% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $170-32% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $48-76% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.6 | 77.0+314% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP107 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #523 | #524 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX450 and Quadro P620
