
GeForce MX450

Quadro P620
GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅40.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Quadro P620 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 40W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌47.1% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 46.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌60% higher power demand at 40W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX450 vs Quadro P620 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Quadro P620 reaches 3,698 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Quadro P620 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 512 (Quadro P620). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1443 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,698 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+75% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+118% | 1.478 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+9% | 1443 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P620 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 64-bit on the Quadro P620.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Quadro P620's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Quadro P620). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-38% | 40W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 69mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+61% | 92.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the Quadro P620 launched at $170. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 32% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 21.8 (Quadro P620) — the Quadro P620 offers 46.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Quadro P620 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $170-32% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 21.8+46% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | GP107 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | February 1 2018 |
| Ranking | #523 | #524 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














