
GeForce MX450

Radeon R9 M485X
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R9 M485X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R9 M485X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R9 M485X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 76.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon R9 M485X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 250W, a 225W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M485X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon R9 M485X
2016Why buy it
- ✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌80% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌900% higher power demand at 250W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon R9 M485X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,801+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2048+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+9% | 2.961 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M485X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M485X.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 163.6% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-90% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+879% | 15.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. On MSRP, GeForce MX450 was 44.4% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the GeForce MX450 offers 77.4% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-44% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9+77% | 8.4 |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Amethyst |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #523 | #519 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














