GeForce MX450 vs GRID M60-4Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce MX450 vs GRID M60-4Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce MX450 vs GRID M60-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce MX450

2020

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,250 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 871% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 1.5 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅GRID M60-4Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 225W, a 200W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

GRID M60-4Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
900% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$250 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.5 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
❌800% higher power demand at 225W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-4Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (3,831 vs 3,720), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce MX450 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce MX450 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,250 cheaper on MSRP at $250 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 871% (14.9 vs 1.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GRID M60-4Q still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce MX450 vs GRID M60-4Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX450

The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

GRID M60-4Q

The GRID M60-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,831 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the GRID M60-4Q reaches 3,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the GRID M60-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-4Q). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-4Q). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GRID M60-4Q
G3D Mark Score	3,720	3,831+3%
Architecture	Turing	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	896	2048+129%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.226 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+50%
Boost Clock	1575 MHz+34%	1178 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	128+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-4Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GRID M60-4Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 64-bit on the GRID M60-4Q.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GRID M60-4Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the GRID M60-4Q's 225W — a 160% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (GRID M60-4Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce MX450	GRID M60-4Q
TDP	25W-89%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Mobile	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	148.8+775%	17.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the GRID M60-4Q launched at $2500. On MSRP, GeForce MX450 was 90% cheaper ($2250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 1.5 (GRID M60-4Q) — the GeForce MX450 offers 893.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce MX450	GRID M60-4Q
MSRP	$250-90%	$2500
Performance per Dollar	14.9+893%	1.5
Codename	N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1	GM204
Release	August 1 2020	August 30 2015
Ranking	#523	#433

Search GeForce MX450 on Amazon

Search GRID M60-4Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.