GeForce MX450 vs T400 4GB
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce MX450 is positioned at rank 307 and the T400 4GB is on rank 63, so the T400 4GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T400 4GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX450.
| Insight | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The T400 4GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $99 versus $200 for the GeForce MX450, it costs 51% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 106.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+106.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($200) | ✅More affordable ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and T400 4GB
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,803+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+195% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+11% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+17% | 126.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the T400 4GB launched at $159 and now averages $99. The T400 4GB costs 50.5% less ($101 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.6 (GeForce MX450) vs 38.4 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 106.5% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $159-36% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $99-51% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.6 | 38.4+106% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU117 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #523 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX450 and T400 4GB
