
GeForce MX450

T400 4GB
GeForce MX450 vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX450 vs T400 4GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce MX450 vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 30W, a 5W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌57.2% HIGHER MSRP$250 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $91 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌20% higher power demand at 30W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX450 vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1575 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720 | 3,803+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+133% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+195% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1575 MHz+11% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The T400 4GB leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 64-bit on the T400 4GB.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-17% | 30W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 156mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+17% | 126.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. On MSRP, T400 4GB was 36.4% cheaper ($91 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 60.4% better value. The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $159-36% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | 23.9+60% |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | TU117 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #523 | #518 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















