
GeForce MX450

Radeon Pro 560X
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon Pro 560X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon Pro 560X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon Pro 560X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce MX450
2020Why buy it
- ✅11.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Radeon Pro 560X is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so GeForce MX450 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 75W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon Pro 560X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce MX450 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 75W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce MX450 vs Radeon Pro 560X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.

Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720+1% | 3,678 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1024+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+57% | 2.056 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX450 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 560X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce MX450 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro 560X.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+204% | 49.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce MX450 came in at $250, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Pro 560X was 100+% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce MX450) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce MX450 (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9 | Infinity |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | July 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #523 | #528 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














