GeForce MX450 vs Radeon Pro 560X
GeForce MX450
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 560X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce MX450 is positioned at rank #307 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX450
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX450 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro 560X.
| Insight | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX450 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX450 and Radeon Pro 560X
GeForce MX450
The GeForce MX450 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,720 points.
Radeon Pro 560X
The Radeon Pro 560X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1004 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,678 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX450 scores 3,720 and the Radeon Pro 560X reaches 3,678 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX450 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro 560X uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 896 (GeForce MX450) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 560X). Raw compute: 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce MX450) vs 2.056 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 560X).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,720+1% | 3,678 |
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 1024+14% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.226 TFLOPS+57% | 2.056 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX450 draws 25W versus the Radeon Pro 560X's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce MX450 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX450) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 560X). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-67% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 148.8+204% | 49.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX450 launched at $250 MSRP and currently averages $200, while the Radeon Pro 560X launched at $0 and now averages $0. The Radeon Pro 560X costs 100+% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 18.6 (GeForce MX450) vs Infinity (Radeon Pro 560X) — the Radeon Pro 560X offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce MX450 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce MX450 | Radeon Pro 560X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $200 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 | Polaris 21 |
| Release | August 1 2020 | July 16 2018 |
| Ranking | #523 | #528 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce MX450 and Radeon Pro 560X
