Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • Measures 145mm instead of 156mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 6.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $170 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.

T400 4GB

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $11 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • Delivers 10% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • Quadro P620 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
T400 4GB is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (3,803 vs 3,698), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
T400 4GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 4GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $11 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $170, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10% (23.9 vs 21.8), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P620T400 4GB
G3D Mark Score
3,698
3,803+3%
Architecture
Pascal
Turing
Process Node
14 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.478 TFLOPS+35%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1443 MHz+1%
1425 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
192 KB
384 KB+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P620T400 4GB
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P620 and 64-bit on the T400 4GB.

FeatureQuadro P620T400 4GB
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureQuadro P620T400 4GB
DirectX
12 (FL12_1)
12_0
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureQuadro P620T400 4GB
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
NVDEC
NVDEC 4th Gen
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 28.6% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro P620T400 4GB
TDP
40W
30W-25%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
145mm
156mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
92.5
126.8+37%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P620 came in at $170, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. On MSRP, T400 4GB was 6.5% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 9.6% better value. The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro P620T400 4GB
MSRP
$170
$159-6%
Performance per Dollar
21.8
23.9+10%
Codename
GP107
TU117
Release
February 1 2018
May 6 2021
Ranking
#524
#518

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.