
Quadro P620

T400 4GB
Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Measures 145mm instead of 156mm, a 11mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌6.9% HIGHER MSRP$170 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.8 vs 23.9 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 40W vs 30W.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ✅Quadro P620 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so T400 4GB is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 40W, a 10W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,803+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS+35% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz+1% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P620 and 64-bit on the T400 4GB.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 28.6% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 30W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 156mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5 | 126.8+37% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P620 came in at $170, while the T400 4GB launched at $159. On MSRP, T400 4GB was 6.5% cheaper ($11 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 23.9 (T400 4GB) — the T400 4GB offers 9.6% better value. The newer card here is T400 4GB (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | $159-6% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.8 | 23.9+10% |
| Codename | GP107 | TU117 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #524 | #518 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















