Quadro P620 vs T400 4GB
Quadro P620
Popular choices:
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P620 is positioned at rank 74 and the T400 4GB is on rank 63, so the T400 4GB offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P620
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The T400 4GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P620.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro P620 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $48 versus $99 for the T400 4GB, it costs 52% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 100.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+100.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($48) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P620 and T400 4GB
Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1443 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,803+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS+35% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1443 MHz+1% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 384 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 28.6% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 156mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W | 30W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 156mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5 | 126.8+37% |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P620 launched at $170 MSRP and currently averages $48, while the T400 4GB launched at $159 and now averages $99. The Quadro P620 costs 51.5% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 77.0 (Quadro P620) vs 38.4 (T400 4GB) — the Quadro P620 offers 100.5% better value. The T400 4GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170 | $159-6% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $48-52% | $99 |
| Performance per Dollar | 77.0+101% | 38.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | TU117 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #524 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P620 and T400 4GB
