Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

2018Core: 1177 MHzBoost: 1443 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

2016Core: 723 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P620

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $280 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Delivers 157.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
  • Radeon R9 M485X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 40W instead of 250W, a 210W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M485X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R9 M485X

2016

Why buy it

  • 69.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 164.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $450 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
  • 525% higher power demand at 250W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R9 M485X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 69.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (3,801 vs 3,698), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro P620 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P620 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $280 cheaper on MSRP at $170 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 157.5% (21.8 vs 8.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M485X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P620

The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon R9 M485X
G3D Mark Score
3,698
3,801+3%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512
2048+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.478 TFLOPS
2.961 TFLOPS+100%
ROPs
16
32+100%
TMUs
32
128+300%
L1 Cache
192 KB
512 KB+167%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon R9 M485X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M485X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Quadro P620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon R9 M485X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M485X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon R9 M485X
DirectX
12 (FL12_1)
12
Vulkan
1.4+17%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon R9 M485X
Encoder
NVENC (Pascal)
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC
UVD 6.0
Codecs
H.264,HEVC
H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 144.8% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon R9 M485X
TDP
40W-84%
250W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
145mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C-13%
80°C
Perf/Watt
92.5+509%
15.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P620 came in at $170, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 62.2% cheaper ($280 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Quadro P620 offers 159.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro P620Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP
$170-62%
$450
Performance per Dollar
21.8+160%
8.4
Codename
GP107
Amethyst
Release
February 1 2018
May 15 2016
Ranking
#524
#519

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.