
Quadro P620

Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P620
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $280 less on MSRP ($170 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 157.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.8 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($170 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon R9 M485X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro P620 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 250W, a 210W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M485X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon R9 M485X
2016Why buy it
- ✅69.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌164.7% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$170 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 21.8 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $170 MSRP).
- ❌525% higher power demand at 250W vs 40W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P620 vs Radeon R9 M485X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P620
The Quadro P620 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1177 MHz to 1443 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,698 points.

Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P620 scores 3,698 and the Radeon R9 M485X reaches 3,801 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P620 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M485X uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Quadro P620) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X). Raw compute: 1.478 TFLOPS (Quadro P620) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,698 | 3,801+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.478 TFLOPS | 2.961 TFLOPS+100% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 512 KB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro P620 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M485X. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro P620) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Quadro P620 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL12_1) (Quadro P620) vs 12 (Radeon R9 M485X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Pascal) (Quadro P620) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X). Decoder: NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Quadro P620) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Pascal) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P620 draws 40W versus the Radeon R9 M485X's 250W — a 144.8% difference. The Quadro P620 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P620) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M485X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-84% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-13% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 92.5+509% | 15.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P620 came in at $170, while the Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450. On MSRP, Quadro P620 was 62.2% cheaper ($280 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.8 (Quadro P620) vs 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) — the Quadro P620 offers 159.5% better value. The newer card here is Quadro P620 (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P620 | Radeon R9 M485X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $170-62% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.8+160% | 8.4 |
| Codename | GP107 | Amethyst |
| Release | February 1 2018 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #524 | #519 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














