Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Quadro M3000M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is positioned at rank 132 and the Quadro M3000M is on rank 9, so the Quadro M3000M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 5100

#66

Radeon PRO W7800

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200

99%

#67

RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1450

94%

#117

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1341%

#132

Radeon Pro WX 5100

MSRP: $499|Avg: $120

100%

#134

Quadro P2000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

97%

#135

Quadro P3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

97%

#136

Quadro P3000

MSRP: $600|Avg: $80

97%

#139

Quadro T1000 (móvel)

MSRP: $500|Avg: $120

91%

#140

Radeon Pro V520

MSRP: $800|Avg: $300

91%

#141

Quadro M5500

MSRP: $800|Avg: $200

90%

#142

Quadro K1200

MSRP: $300|Avg: $184

90%

#143

Quadro P400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $60

89%

#144

Radeon Pro WX 7100

MSRP: $799|Avg: $180

87%

#145

Quadro M520

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

87%

#146

Radeon Sky 500

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

86%

#147

Quadro M5000

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro M3000M

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

186%

#9

Quadro M3000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M3000M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Quadro M3000M
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+97.6%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	Normal Efficiency	Normal Efficiency
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro M3000M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro WX 5100 Benchmark Check

Quadro M3000M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro WX 5100 and Quadro M3000M

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro M3000M

The Quadro M3000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 1,024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,574 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 5,500 and the Quadro M3000M reaches 5,574 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Quadro M3000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 1 (Quadro M3000M). Raw compute: 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Quadro M3000M
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,574+1%
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792+75%	1,024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.892 TFLOPS+81%	2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112+75%	64
L1 Cache	448 KB+17%	384 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Quadro M3000M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M3000M has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 offers 97.6% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Quadro M3000M
VRAM Capacity	7.906 GB+98%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M3000M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Quadro M3000M
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) (Quadro M3000M). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only) (Quadro M3000M).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Quadro M3000M
Encoder	VCE 3.4	3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder	UVD 6.3	PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Decode Only)

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 draws 75W versus the Quadro M3000M's 75W — a 0% difference. The Quadro M3000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 350W (Quadro M3000M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 82°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Quadro M3000M
TDP	75W	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	173mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	82°C	75°C-9%
Perf/Watt	73.3	74.3+1%