G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅19.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅295.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 190W, a 115W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 221mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
150.8% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.0 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon R9 285 / 380

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 153% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.9 vs 11.0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌153.3% higher power demand at 190W vs 75W.
❌27.7% longer card at 221mm vs 173mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R9 285 / 380 instead at 5,550 vs 5,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2014. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 285 / 380 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $300 cheaper on MSRP at $199 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 153% (27.9 vs 11.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro WX 5100 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon Pro WX 5100 vs Radeon R9 285 / 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon R9 285 / 380

The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 scores 5,500 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Radeon R9 285 / 380
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,550
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1792	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.892 TFLOPS+18%	3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	112	112
L1 Cache	448 KB	448 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Radeon R9 285 / 380
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 295.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100 and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 285 / 380. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Radeon R9 285 / 380
VRAM Capacity	7.906 GB+295%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Radeon R9 285 / 380
DirectX	12 (12_0)	12
Vulkan	1.3+8%	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs UVD 5.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Radeon R9 285 / 380
Encoder	VCE 3.4	VCE 3.0
Decoder	UVD 6.3	UVD 5.0
Codecs	H.264,HEVC	H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 draws 75W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 86.8% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 173mm vs 221mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Radeon R9 285 / 380
TDP	75W-61%	190W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	173mm	221mm
Height	69mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	82°C	—
Perf/Watt	73.3+151%	29.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon Pro WX 5100 came in at $499, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon R9 285 / 380 was 60.1% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the Radeon R9 285 / 380 offers 153.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 5100 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon Pro WX 5100	Radeon R9 285 / 380
MSRP	$499	$199-60%
Performance per Dollar	11.0	27.9+154%
Codename	Ellesmere	Tonga
Release	November 18 2016	September 2 2014
Ranking	#416	#365

Search Radeon Pro WX 5100 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 285 / 380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.