GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

CPU

GPU

GeForce GTX 680

2012Core: 1006 MHzBoost: 1058 MHz

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016Core: 713 MHzBoost: 1086 MHz

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 680

4 GB 195

5,609

+2.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon Pro WX 5100

7.906 GB 75

5,500

0.0%

Radeon R9 260

Radeon RX 560

Radeon R9 270 / R7 370

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680

2012

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌160% higher power demand at 195W vs 75W.
❌48% longer card at 256mm vs 173mm.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

✅42.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
✅Draws 75W instead of 195W, a 120W reduction.
✅Measures 173mm instead of 256mm, a 83mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 42.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 680 instead at 5,609 vs 5,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 680 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 680 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $499 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2% (11.2 vs 11.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon Pro WX 5100 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680

The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score	5,609+2%	5,500
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1536	1792+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.25 TFLOPS	3.892 TFLOPS+20%
Boost Clock	1058 MHz	1086 MHz+3%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+14%	112
L1 Cache	128 KB	448 KB+250%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 97.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	7.906 GB+98%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro WX 5100
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	VCE 3.4
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,HEVC

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 88.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 256mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 98°C vs 82°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro WX 5100
TDP	195W	75W-62%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	256mm	173mm
Height	111mm	69mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	98°C	82°C-16%
Perf/Watt	28.8	73.3+155%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 680 came in at $499, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 launched at $499. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 11.0 (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the GeForce GTX 680 offers 1.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 5100 (2016 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP	$499	$499
Performance per Dollar	11.2+2%	11.0
Codename	GK104	Ellesmere
Release	March 22 2012	November 18 2016
Ranking	#410	#416

Search GeForce GTX 680 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro WX 5100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.