GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 5100

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016Core: 713 MHzBoost: 1086 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 5100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro WX 5100 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • 126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.

Radeon Pro WX 5100

2016

Why buy it

  • 47.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 97.6% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
  • Measures 173mm instead of 241mm, a 68mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (5,500 vs 5,474), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 5100 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 5100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon Pro WX 5100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 5100

The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 713 MHz to 1086 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Radeon Pro WX 5100 reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 3.892 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1086 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon Pro WX 5100
G3D Mark Score
5,474
5,500
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
1344
1792+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
3.892 TFLOPS+48%
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1086 MHz+11%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112
112
L1 Cache
112 KB
448 KB+300%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon Pro WX 5100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 5100 carries 8 GB. Radeon Pro WX 5100 gives you 97.6% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 5100. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro WX 5100) — the Radeon Pro WX 5100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon Pro WX 5100
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
7.906 GB+98%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon Pro WX 5100
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 5100).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon Pro WX 5100
Encoder
1st Gen NVENC
VCE 3.4
Decoder
1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro WX 5100's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 5100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 5100). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 173mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 82°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon Pro WX 5100
TDP
170W
75W-56%
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
173mm
Height
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
82°C-4%
Perf/Watt
32.2
73.3+128%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro WX 5100 (2016 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon Pro WX 5100
MSRP
$499
Codename
GK104
Ellesmere
Release
September 27 2013
November 18 2016
Ranking
#417
#416

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.