GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
Popular choices:
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,474 | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344+33500% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | 1950 MHz+99% |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 768 KB+586% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 32.2 | 366.7+1039% |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $100 |
| Codename | GK104 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | September 27 2013 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #417 | #496 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
