
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013Why buy it
- ✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
2012Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2012. It features the GCN architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2,560 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 900 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,474 | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 2560+90% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz+9% | 900 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 153.6 GB/s x2 (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire) — a 25% advantage for the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 256-bit x2 on the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s+25% | 153.6 GB/s x2 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit x2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire's 200W — a 16.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-15% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.2+17% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GK104 | Neptune CF |
| Release | September 27 2013 | May 1 2012 |
| Ranking | #417 | #350 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















