GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GRID M60-8A

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GRID M60-8A FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GRID M60-8A: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
❌24000% longer card at 241mm vs 1mm.

GRID M60-8A

2015

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Measures 1mm instead of 241mm, a 240mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-8A is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (5,523 vs 5,474), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID M60-8A makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID M60-8A is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs GRID M60-8A Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

GRID M60-8A

The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the GRID M60-8A reaches 5,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the GRID M60-8A uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8A). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	GRID M60-8A
G3D Mark Score	5,474	5,523
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1344	2048+52%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.634 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+83%
Boost Clock	980 MHz	1178 MHz+20%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	112	128+14%
L1 Cache	112 KB	768 KB+586%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-8A leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	GRID M60-8A
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 128-bit on the GRID M60-8A. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) — the GRID M60-8A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	GRID M60-8A
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12_1 (GRID M60-8A). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	GRID M60-8A
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Max Displays	4	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the GRID M60-8A's 225W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (GRID M60-8A). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	GRID M60-8A
TDP	170W-24%	225W
Recommended PSU	500W	350W-30%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	1mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	32.2+31%	24.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GRID M60-8A (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	GRID M60-8A
MSRP	—	$2500
Codename	GK104	GM204
Release	September 27 2013	August 30 2015
Ranking	#417	#505

Search GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM on Amazon

Search GRID M60-8A on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.