GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
VS
Radeon R9 280

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

2013Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 280

2014Boost: 933 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 280 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon R9 280
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)
Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R9 280 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Radeon R9 280

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 280

The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Radeon R9 280 reaches 5,532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 933 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon R9 280
G3D Mark Score
5,474
5,532+1%
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344
1792+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
3.344 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock
980 MHz+5%
933 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
112
112
L1 Cache
112 KB
448 KB+300%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon R9 280
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 has 3 GB. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) — a 25% advantage for the Radeon R9 280. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon R9 280
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+33%
3 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
192 GB/s
240 GB/s+25%
Bus Width
256-bit
384-bit+50%
L2 Cache
512 KB
768 KB+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 16.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon R9 280
TDP
170W-15%
200W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
241mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
32.2+16%
27.7
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 280 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEMRadeon R9 280
MSRP
$279
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Codename
GK104
Tahiti
Release
September 27 2013
March 4 2014
Ranking
#417
#415