
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

Radeon R9 280
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 280 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 280 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 280: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2013Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 3 GB).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 280 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Radeon R9 280
2014Why buy it
- ✅21.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2014 hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Radeon R9 280 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

Radeon R9 280
The Radeon R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 4 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 933 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,532 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Radeon R9 280 reaches 5,532 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 280 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 280). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 3.344 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 280). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 933 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,474 | 5,532+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1344 | 1792+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.634 TFLOPS | 3.344 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz+5% | 933 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 112 KB | 448 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 280 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 280 carries 3 GB. GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 240 GB/s (Radeon R9 280) — a 25% advantage for the Radeon R9 280. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 384-bit on the Radeon R9 280. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 768 KB (Radeon R9 280) — the Radeon R9 280 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 240 GB/s+25% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 768 KB+50% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 280's 200W — a 16.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 500W (Radeon R9 280). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-15% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 32.2+16% | 27.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R9 280 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $279 |
| Codename | GK104 | Tahiti |
| Release | September 27 2013 | March 4 2014 |
| Ranking | #417 | #415 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















