GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

170

5,474

0.0%

GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

15

5,500

+0.5%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.

Insight	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	Xe LPG (2023) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Benchmark Check

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 27 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,474 points.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM scores 5,474 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM is built on Kepler while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1950 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
G3D Mark Score	5,474	5,500
Architecture	Kepler	Xe LPG
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1344+33500%	4
Boost Clock	980 MHz	1950 MHz+99%
L1 Cache	112 KB	768 KB+586%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)	XeSS
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	192 GB/s	System
Bus Width	256-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_2
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)).

Feature	GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM	Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC	QuickSync
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)	QuickSync
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM draws 170W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.